Blog

The Circus Artist's Guide to Creative Problem Solving in Business

Related Articles:

Three years ago, I watched a trapeze artist solve what looked like an impossible problem. Mid-performance, her safety net had somehow gotten tangled with the rigging cables. Instead of stopping the show, she improvised an entirely new routine that incorporated the "mistake" into something brilliant. The crowd thought it was planned.

That moment taught me more about creative problem solving than fifteen years of consulting ever had.

Most business training approaches problem solving like it's accountancy—methodical, linear, predictable. But real problems don't arrive with neat categories and step-by-step solutions. They show up like that tangled net: messy, urgent, and demanding something you've never tried before.

Why Traditional Problem Solving Fails

The corporate world loves frameworks. Six Sigma. Root cause analysis. The 5 Whys. Don't get me wrong—these tools have their place. But they're like using a scalpel to carve a turkey. Technically precise, completely wrong for the job.

I've seen teams spend weeks mapping out elaborate problem-solving processes only to discover the real issue was something nobody had considered. A Melbourne manufacturing client once hired me to fix their "productivity problem." After two days onsite, I realised their productivity was fine. Their problem was that the finance team had been measuring the wrong metrics for eighteen months.

Traditional approaches assume problems stay still long enough to be dissected. In reality, business problems are more like Australian weather—unpredictable, constantly shifting, and likely to surprise you when you least expect it.

The Circus Mindset

Circus performers are the ultimate creative problem solvers. They work with limited resources, high stakes, and no time for lengthy analysis. When something goes wrong, they have seconds to adapt.

This mindset translates beautifully to business. Instead of asking "What's the approved procedure?" creative problem solvers ask "What's possible with what we've got?"

Take my client in Perth who ran a small logistics company. Traditional wisdom said they needed expensive tracking software to compete with the big players. Instead, they created a WhatsApp group with their drivers and customers. Customers could get real-time updates, drivers could report issues instantly, and the whole system cost them nothing. Their customer satisfaction scores went through the roof.

That's circus thinking. Work with the constraints, not against them.

The Power of Stupid Questions

Here's something that'll make some managers uncomfortable: the best solutions often come from asking really dumb questions.

"Why do we do it this way?" "What if we stopped doing this entirely?" "What would a ten-year-old suggest?"

I remember facilitating a creative problem solving workshop where a junior staff member asked why they needed approval for purchases under $50. Seemed obvious—budget control, right?

Turns out the approval process cost more than the purchases themselves. Three managers spending ten minutes each to approve a $30 office supply order. The maths didn't work. They scrapped the whole system and saved thousands in productivity.

Sometimes the stupid question is the smart question.

The Three-Ring Approach

I've developed what I call the Three-Ring Approach to creative problem solving. Like a circus, you need three different performances happening simultaneously:

Ring One: The Practical - What needs to happen right now to keep things moving? This is your safety net. Basic functionality, immediate fixes, damage control.

Ring Two: The Possible - What could we do if we had more time, resources, or freedom? This is where most creative solutions live. Not pie-in-the-sky dreaming, but practical alternatives that require some effort.

Ring Three: The Preposterous - What would we do if money, time, and physics weren't constraints? This ring sounds useless, but it's where breakthrough thinking happens. Most "impossible" ideas contain kernels of very possible solutions.

A Sydney restaurant owner used this approach during COVID lockdowns. Ring One: takeaway orders to survive. Ring Two: meal kits for home cooking. Ring Three: virtual dining experiences where customers could cook along with the chef via video call.

Guess which one became their most profitable revenue stream?

Why Most Brainstorming Sessions Are Terrible

Let me be blunt: 90% of brainstorming sessions are productivity theatre. Everyone sits around a whiteboard throwing out obvious ideas while one person writes everything down and another person nods encouragingly.

The problem isn't the concept—it's the execution. Good brainstorming requires constraints, not freedom. Give people unlimited options and they'll default to what they already know.

Instead, try adding weird limitations:

"Solve this using only things you can buy at a service station"
"What if we had to fix this by Thursday with no budget?"
"How would a food truck handle this problem?"

Constraints force creative thinking. Problem solving decision making training that doesn't include constraint-based exercises is missing the point entirely.

I once worked with a team that couldn't agree on anything. Instead of traditional consensus-building, I gave them five minutes to solve their problem using only solutions that rhymed. Sounds ridiculous, right?

The silly constraint broke down their defensive positions. They started laughing, stopped being precious about their ideas, and found a solution that worked. Sometimes you need to get ridiculous to get results.

The Failure Archive

Here's something most consultants won't tell you: I keep a detailed record of every solution that didn't work. Not because I enjoy documenting failure, but because failed solutions are goldmines of insight.

That Perth logistics company I mentioned? Their WhatsApp solution came directly from a previous failure. Six months earlier, they'd tried implementing a expensive customer portal that nobody used. The failure taught them that their customers wanted simple, immediate communication—not fancy interfaces.

Smart companies collect their failures like rare coins. Each one represents expensive learning that shouldn't be wasted.

Unfortunately, most organisations treat failures like embarrassing relatives—acknowledge them briefly, then never speak of them again. This is backwards thinking. Your failures contain more useful information than your successes because they show you exactly where the edges are.

The Time Problem

Creative problem solving takes time, and time is the one thing most businesses think they don't have. This creates a vicious cycle: urgent problems demand quick fixes, quick fixes create more problems, more problems mean less time for creative solutions.

Breaking this cycle requires what I call "investment thinking." Sometimes you need to spend extra time on one problem to prevent ten future problems.

A Brisbane manufacturing company was having constant equipment breakdowns. The obvious solution was reactive maintenance—fix things when they break. The creative solution was to give machine operators permission to stop production whenever they noticed something unusual, even if the machine was still technically working.

Counterintuitive? Absolutely. Effective? Production downtime dropped by 60% within three months.

Why Diversity Beats Expertise

Most teams approach problem solving by assembling their smartest people and hoping genius emerges through concentration. This is like trying to create a rainbow using only blue light.

Creative solutions need diverse perspectives more than they need deep expertise. The marketing person might see angles the engineer missed. The receptionist might understand customer behaviour better than the product manager.

I've facilitated sessions where the breakthrough insight came from someone completely outside the industry. A childcare worker helped a construction company rethink their safety protocols. A musician helped a software company redesign their user interface.

Outside perspectives aren't contaminated by "that won't work because..." thinking. They ask different questions because they don't know which questions they're not supposed to ask.

The Implementation Gap

Here's where most creative problem solving falls apart: the gap between great ideas and actual implementation. Ideas are easy. Execution is hard.

The circus performer doesn't just imagine a new routine—they practice it until it becomes muscle memory. Business teams often treat implementation like an afterthought.

Smart problem solvers build implementation thinking into the creative process from the beginning. Instead of asking "What's a good solution?" they ask "What's a good solution that we can actually execute with our current resources and culture?"

This isn't about limiting creativity—it's about making creativity useful.

The Real Secret

After nearly two decades in this game, I've learned that the real secret to creative problem solving isn't technique or frameworks or brainstorming exercises.

It's courage.

Courage to ask uncomfortable questions. Courage to try things that might not work. Courage to admit when conventional wisdom isn't working. Courage to look stupid in service of finding something that actually works.

Most people have more creative problem-solving ability than they realise. What they lack is permission to use it.

The trapeze artist didn't solve her problem because she had special training or superior technique. She solved it because she had seconds to decide: try something new or let the show fail.

That's the choice we all face, every day, in every challenging situation.

The net is already tangled. The question is: what are you going to do about it?